Run enterprise AI search without moving a single document

Every claim carries the source document and section it came from, so you verify it yourself in about ten seconds, a click, not a research task. Before go-live, retrieval quality is tested against real questions from your function, with correctness judged by the people who already know the answers, not a benchmark score.

Answers are written only from passages retrieval actually found in your documents, never from what the model absorbed in training. Where no supporting passage exists, DCT Sage says so rather than guessing. When sources disagree, an old policy and its replacement, two contracts with different terms, that conflict is surfaced, not quietly resolved.

No, and we'd advise against it. Sources are indexed where they already sit, nothing is consolidated or duplicated, so there's no second copy of your contracts to keep in sync. It also means the index follows the source: when a policy changes at the source, the answer changes with it.

No. Retrieval enforces the access controls already on each source, so two people asking the same question only see what each of them can already open. DCT Sage holds no permission of its own to lend out, which is what prevents the common failure mode of everything getting copied into one index and losing those boundaries.

That's largely the point. Because the index follows the source rather than a copy, an amended contract or superseded standard changes what comes back immediately. In domains where the ground moves constantly, sustainability disclosure, sector regulation, an answer that's fast but out of date is a liability, not a saving.

For a small set of documents, that works fine, and we'll say so. At enterprise scale it breaks down: the document set is too large, cost scales with everything you send rather than what's relevant, and quality drops as unrelated material crowds out the useful passages. The engineering exists to find the right handful of paragraphs.

Questions with an answer somewhere in your documents that currently take a skilled person half a day to assemble: what a contract obliges you to do, whether a policy permits something, what was decided on a similar matter. It handles judgement questions badly, and should, since those need someone accountable to weigh them.

By scoping your sources: which ones matter, who owns them, how sensitive and fresh they need to be. Then connecting rather than migrating, and testing retrieval quality against real questions before anyone sees it live. One function goes live first, and the baseline is re-measured before it extends further.